Here is an example: The Cardboard divider apparatus on the right divided the sensory table into cubicle-like spaces.
The cardboard walls of those cubicle-like spaces actually allowed the children to reach a higher degree of focus to better know the properties of corn.
I kept the divider apparatus up for a second week, but I added some new features. I added a PVC pipe and a clear plastic tube both on angles through the cross vertical panels on either side of the apparatus. I also added a cardboard tube embedded horizontally through the cross vertical panels.
If the apparatus played a role in how the children understood the properties of corn, how did the addition of these features shape to their explorations? To give this examination a manageable focus, I will highlight some of the operations the children carried out using only the clear plastic tube.
Just like the walls focused children's attention, the tube also focused one child's attention on how the corn flowed down the tube. Below, the child scooped up corn in a plastic measuring cup and slowly and deliberately poured the corn down the tube. Sometimes only one kernel dropped from his cup and sometimes several.
Corn down the tube from Thomas Bedard on Vimeo.
In either case, he observed how the corn went down the tube. Once or twice, he even made sure he saw how the corn exited before he poured any more corn down the tube.
I was very impressed at his laser-like focus as he observed how the corn went down the tube. I was not only impressed, I was curious. I decided video tape the corn going down the tube.
Corn sliding down the tube from Thomas Bedard on Vimeo.
I was surprised at how the corn behaved in the tube. First, the flow was really quite smooth. From my experience with corn going down an incline chute, I thought the kernels would have bounced or tumbled down the tube. The other surprise was that kernels ended up flowing single file as they exited the tube.
The corn flowing down the tube connected children in their play. Below, one child poured corn down the tube and the other caught it in a stainless steel bowl.
Connecting in play from Thomas Bedard on Vimeo.
The tube was not enough to connect these two in play. The corn and how it flowed through the tube completed the play circuit. In fact at one point in the operation, the flow of corn physically connected the child pouring, the tube and the child catching. It is almost as if the corn drew a continuous line connecting the two children through the tube.
Here is much different example of how the corn sliding down the tube connected children in play. A child poured corn down the tube after another child had placed her eye over the bottom of the tube. This operation, in essence, added a somatic component to this child's understanding of corn as the corn piled up against her eye.
Eye on the corn from Thomas Bedard on Vimeo.
As she moved her eye back from the bottom of the tube, the kernels gently fell on her cheek, again adding a somatic component to her exploration.
The child who did the pouring, of course, wanted to know how the corn felt against his eye, so they switched places.
In my last post I asked: How many ways are there to know the properties of corn? Maybe it is enough to know that there are innumerable ways for children to know and understand corn. And that it is possible to expand on their ways of knowing by offering them richly provisioned environments---physical and social---in which they can recruit their competencies and imagination to come to know the properties of corn.
No comments:
Post a Comment