Can we fill the bucket?
That sounds like such a simple question. However, a simple question like that can tell us a lot about how children think. The underlying assumption of this statement is that thinking and doing are synonymous for young children.
Below are two videos in which children started with the question: Can we fill the bucket? I would venture a guess that they did not start out with that question. Instead, their actions began by simply transporting the sand out of the table into the bucket next to the table (see axiom #1 in the right hand column of this blog). At some point, they filled the bucket enough, that the question of filling the bucket became real. This is the point at which my narrative begins.
A child filled his pot with sand. His objective was to carry it around the table to fill a five
gallon pail on the other side. Another child accurately assessed that the pot was heavy so
he attempted to help the child carrying the pot to help. That child carrying
the pot saw his overture, but dismissed it. That child who wanted to help then started to back up as the child
carrying the pot started walking forward. The child who wanted to help
still found a way to help. He darted ahead and gently moved a child out
of the way so there was room for the child carrying the pot to empty his
pot into the bucket. As the pot emptied, the child who
had tried to help got more and more excited as the level of the sand in the bucket got higher. By the end of the video, the children screeched with excitement at how full the bucket was getting.
Filling the bucket 1 from Thomas Bedard on Vimeo.
From the video, the question looked more like a dialogue between the children. Some of that dialogue was verbal and some of it nonverbal. Some of it looked like a question: How do I help? Some of it looked like an answer to the question: I'll clear the way so he can pour the sand in the bucket. And some of it looked like commentary on the process: the screeching and jumping up and down with delight.
The children filled the bucket within an inch of the top. They could have put more sand in the bucket so why did they stop there? In any case, this was how full they decided they wanted it to be. At this point the questioned morphed into: Can we lift it? This is where the second part of my narrative begins.
One child decided to see if he could lift the bucket full of sand. As he strained to lift the
bucket he said: "Help. We need help." The child right behind him stepped
forward but did not offer help. Instead, he said he wanted to try. This child strained and was able
to move the bucket a little bit by himself. He even asserted: " I kind
of lifted it." A third child stepped forward and said "let me try now."
He was not able to lift or move it. A fourth child stepped forward and
said: "I bet I can do it." He tried but he was also unsuccessful in his
attempt to lift. The child who first tried to lift the bucket and asked
for help then stepped forward to grab the handle of the bucket. As he did that, he uttered a simple command: "team work." He repeated his command implored the others to grab the handle together. With mighty grunts, four of the children
grabbed the handle and started to lift. They were able to
lift it and move it slightly. The bucket actually ended up on top of that
child's foot. "Ow!" he exclaimed. As the video ended, the three other children helped get the bucket off his foot.
Filling the bucket 3 from Thomas Bedard on Vimeo.
As the children answered one question, another one presented itself. In the process, their thinking became more complex and eventually even more coordinated. They worked out taking turns without anyone---meaning an adult---telling them when and how take turns. They worked out lifting the bucket together without anyone---meaning an adult---telling them when and how to.
Teachers are not always so good at asking questions. Too often we ask
questions of fact. Even such a simple question of filling the bucket uttered by an adult too easily morphs into a lesson in which we ask another question such as: How many cups do you think it will take to fill the bucket? Those type
of questions don't promote or get at children's thinking.
Not every moment has to be a teaching moment.
Children, on the other hand, are a source of good questions. Given the time and materials, children's questions, both simple and complex, present a window into their thinking. Not every moment has to be a teaching moment, but every moment is a learning moment. Children's questions may be the best measure of how and what they are learning.
Thanks for all your posts and all the ways you share both the apparatus you create, and the ways that children explore them. I really appreciate it. I teach a STEM enrichment preschool, and next year, I'm working to enhance our sensory play (I wrote a post compiling all my ideas as "the ultimate guide to sensory tables" https://inventorsoftomorrow.com/2018/06/22/sensory-bins/) and I plan to add some apparatus in as the year goes on!
ReplyDelete